Saturday, November 12, 2011

CHUCK'S LOCK BOX



We can all remember when Alexandria City Attorney Chuck Johnson showed us and the City Council his famous lock box and deduct box. Chuck told us that our rebates were in the lock box.


Of course, federal Judge Dee Drell wrote that there was NO MONEY in Chuck's lock box (See: the Legal Committee in "ALEXANDRIA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 29, 2010 " and "THE NAKED UTILITY: "IN JUDGE DRELLS 'S OWN WORDS: NO LOCKBOX").

This would not be the last time that Chuck Johnson has lied to us and the Alexandria City Council.

Alexandria Mayor Jacques Roy, and his cronies, also lied to us about the settlement of our $60 million fraud lawsuit against Cleco for pennies on the dollar ("MAYOR ROY'S ADMINISTRATIVE BRIEFING OF 3-3-2010 ON THE CLECO DEAL"), he also lied to us and the City Council about our future settlement value and our rebates from Cleco, none of which we have yet seen (See "THE CLECO SETTLEMENT" at the sidebar on the right of this blog).

And Bridgett Brown also had a different view of the facts from Jacques' in the recent federal court attorney fees cases ("BRIDGETT BROWN'S FACTS AGAINST THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA AND MAYOR JACQUES ROY").

While we are still waiting on Judge Drell's ruling in the Brown, Sharp and Davidson attorney fee cases from federal court, the Alexandria City Council will take our power supply agreement and our rebates from Cleco at Tuesday's City Council meeting.

Let us hope that we will finally get some straight answers.

3 comments:

  1. "Let us hope that we will finally get some straight answers"

    WHAT???
    and ruin a perfect run of good lies?
    And. Mr. Aymond, there really isn't a Santa Claus, either.

    Seriously, as an independent blogger, you should run a poll so we could determine voter confidence in our mayorial leadership. But that would require a check box for Mighty Mouth and a check box for Kay. Probably wouldn't work, so fugedaboutit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Does anyone really think that if the deal Jacques reached with Cleco was really better than the deal that the City Council approved in Dec. '08 that would have provided the City with $29M in upfront money, we wouldn't be reading about it each month in the Town Talk? If Jacques' deal was really better, we would be treated to a side by side comparison chart each month, showing what our bills would have been under the original agreement, and how much lower the bills are under the deal that Jacques put together. Jacques' silence says it all. If there ever is a rebate (unlikely), it will come from money generated by the artificial markup in natural gas costs contained in the power supply contract fuel pricing mechanism. In other words, we'll pay ourselves a rebate with our own money. Great job, Jacques!

    ReplyDelete
  3. November 14, 2011 10:01 AM:

    The City Council DID NOT approve the $29 million offer from Cleco.

    But anyway that you look at it, that $29 million or the paltry sum that Jacques did settle for does not equal the $60 million that our experts claim that Cleco defrauded us out of.

    ReplyDelete